How do 'express' and 'implied' contracts differ?

The distinction between express and implied contracts lies in how the terms and agreements are communicated. In express contracts, the parties involved explicitly state the terms and conditions, either verbally or in writing. This means that all aspects of the agreement are clearly articulated, providing a straightforward understanding of each party's responsibilities and rights.

On the other hand, implied contracts are based on the actions, conduct, or circumstances of the parties involved, rather than on written or spoken words. In these cases, the law assumes that a contract exists based on how the parties have acted or interacted, even if there is no formal agreement documented. This makes implied contracts an essential aspect of contract law, as they help enforce agreements that are not expressed but are still recognized legally due to the parties' behaviors.

The correct answer highlights the fundamental nature of these two types of contracts: express contracts are explicitly stated, while implied contracts arise from assumed obligations based on the context. The other options do not accurately capture this difference in the nature of how agreements are formed and recognized.